← 返回首页
以牙还牙Extremities

以牙还牙Extremities

8.8
1986
美国
剧情简介
An intended rape victim manages to escape from her attacker but leaves her purse behind. Worried tha
类型
地区

用户评论

不知道什么原因,很难读的下去。而且感觉有很多重复的话。但总体来说,思想内核还是很好。要反思的
都辰阳 · 1.0/10
推荐大家去看李继宏译本里面的导读,对编剧的生平以及作品背景简单了解下,他写的很深刻也非常有趣。 整本剧的主旨显然就是:What is essential is invisible to the eyes. 我想要理解的几个点,1是日落这一意象,看到有个人对于Sunset日落这一意象的解释是:sunset means hope for another day. after the sunset, a new day begins.是说日落象征着新一天的希望,编剧故乡法国沦陷的二战背景下,这一理解我觉得是十分合理的。 2是最后沙漠里的那口井,编剧喝井水的时候想到了圣诞节,这一点是在说明其实是精神饥渴而不是身体。His thoughts of Christmas ceremonies suggest that his spirit, and not his body, is what truly thirsts. 真的真的,影视理解很费脑,但也很有趣,上面2点都是看到别人的分析,我目前还无法做到自己推出来。但是我们总要试一试 《以牙还牙Extremities》这部剧呢对我最开始的吸引就是那些简单但唯美的意象,我们都觉得自己像以牙还牙Extremities吧,我们认为自己特别,我们把我们喜欢的东西看作玫瑰、狐狸、日落,其实每个人都可以是以牙还牙Extremities啦。带着圣埃克苏佩里的美好想象一起在这世界看日落吧 如下是在外网摘的一些理解,觉得写的还不错: Le Petit Prince draws unflattering portraits of grown-ups as being hopelessly narrow-minded. In contrast, children come to wisdom through open-mindness and a willingness to explore the world around them and within themselves. The main theme of the fable is expressed in the secret that the fox tells the little prince: “It is only with the heart that one can see rightly: what is essential is invisible to the eye.” “All grownups were once children ... but only few of them remember it.” This is not an exercise in nostalgia or the desire to retreat the past. Rather, it is an embrace of all that has gone into making up a full grown being. We ought not to forget that we are rather rare creatures , made up of imagination and memory and dearly-won virtues. The past is part of who we are. “I have lived a great deal among grownups. I have seen them intimately, close at hand. And that hasn’t much
笔墨诛心 · 9.8/10
这部剧是从婚恋史的角度(角度独特),对民国才子进行讲述,看前面几章时候,我意难平,认为声名鹊起的影视大家,对妻子,婚姻过于冷漠,但随着时间和人生经历的渐渐增加,我读后面的时候,越来越平静,他们也是普普通通的人,也裹挟在时代浪潮,希望对中国的文化贡献自己的一份力量,无论他们是保守还是激进。封建家教的长期压抑、强加的婚姻、西方思想的涌入等等都会对人造成影响……我不是为这些“影视大家”开脱,但是我们也不可能让人一边在学术上造诣颇高,一边作风优良……人非圣贤,孰能无过……
ᴶᴵᴬᴹ® · 4.4/10